Return to Primary Index
Middle East Struggle Index
National/International Index
US environmentalists called "Terrorists"
Even The Nation covers for Israel
Jewish art, Palestinian land
US media finds Jews suffer, Palestinians blamed
US vetoes UN observers in Palestine
Israeli propaganda creates obstacles to peace over Jerusalem
The World Rejects US Bullying and Racism
The Question "Why do militant Muslims hate us?" yields more spin than answers
Ahud Barak compares 9/11 WTC deaths of 3000 to the 400 Jews killed in 34 years by Palestinians
Israel's terrorist bomb kills five Palestinian chlidren
Israel provokes Hamas violence
United Nations Resolution 242: demands Israel withdraw from land seized in 1967 War
National Public Radio under attack from US Jews, retracts coverage of Israeli Settlers' violence against Palestinians
The US double standard for terrorism in Palestine
Demos Pres Carter defends Palestinian Human Rights; Rep Waxman favors Israel
Mandela defends Barghouti

Zionism distorts US politics by Congressman Paul Findley

10/02/02

* Paul Findley was a representative in the US Congress from Illinois from 1961 to 1983. He is the author of three books related to the Middle East, the latest being Silent No More: Confronting America's False Images of Islam. He resides in Jacksonville, Illinois.

Findley, tells it like it is with the US support for Israel. The invisibility of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee, http://www.aipac.org/) to the American public is the closest thing to a really big conspiracy I know of. Any mention of AIPAC must acknowledge its enormous influence as a political lobby focused on the foreign policy of the US. AIPAC's allegiance to Israel makes its influence on US politicians controversial. The organization's strategic invisibility, honored by ALL major US media, is based on an essential bedrock of American political correctness: criticism of Israel suggests, however remotely, anti-Semitism. Findley warns against the dangers of an American foreign policy hostage to the pro-Israel lobby. _____Carl Reynolds

Removing the blindfolds: Israel is a scoff-law nation and should be treated as such.

Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM, a major Egyptian paper established in 1875.

October 2, 2002

Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the US government had refused to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe the catastrophe could have been prevented if any US president during the past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all US aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

The US lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any determined president -- even President Bush this very day -- could prevail and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by laying these facts before the American people:

Israel's present government, like its predecessors, is determined to annex the West Bank -- biblical Judea and Samaria -- so Israel will become Greater Israel. In its violent assaults on Palestinians, Israel uses the pretext of eradicating terrorism, but its forces are actually engaged in advancing the territorial expansion just cited. Under the guise of anti- terrorism, Israeli forces treat Palestinians worse than cattle. With due process nowhere to be found, hundreds are detained for long periods and most are tortured. Some are assassinated. Homes, orchards, and business places are destroyed. Entire cities are kept under intermittent curfew, some confinements lasting for weeks. Injured or ill Palestinians needing emergency medical care are routinely held at checkpoints for an hour or more. Many children are undernourished. The West Bank and Gaza have become giant concentration camps. None of this could have occurred without US support. Perhaps Israeli officials believe life will become so unbearable that most Palestinians will eventually leave their ancestral homes.

Once beloved worldwide, the US government finds itself reviled in most countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli violations of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the precepts of all major religious faiths.

How did the American people get into this fix?

Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's US lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper US role in the Arab- Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from public awareness the fact that the US government gives massive uncritical support to Israel.

Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel's US lobby, open discussion of the Arab- Israeli conflict has been non- existent in our government all these years. I have first-hand knowledge, because I was a member of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in June 1967 when Israeli military forces took control of the Golan Heights, a part of Syria, as well as the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years and to this day maintain a close watch on Congress.

For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in either chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle East policy. No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel have been offered for 20 years, and none of the few offered in previous years received more than a handful of votes. On Capitol Hill, criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not anti-Semitic. The continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke out -- Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul "Pete" McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself -- were defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel forces.

As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily biased in favour of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs year after year. Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally lop-sided in Israel's favour, remain largely unaware that Congress behaves as if it were a subcommittee of the Israeli Parliament.

However, the bias is widely noted beyond America, where most news media candidly cover Israel's conquest and generally excoriate America's complicity and complacency. When President Bush welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, sometimes called the Butcher of Beirut, as "my dear friend" and "a man of peace" after Israeli forces, using US-donated arms, completed their devastation of the West Bank last spring, worldwide anger against American policy reached the boiling point.

The fury should surprise no one who reads foreign newspapers or listens to BBC. In several televised statements long before 11 September, Osama Bin Laden, believed by US authorities to have masterminded 11 September, cited US complicity in Israel's destruction of Palestinian society as a principal complaint. Prominent foreigners, in and out of government, express their opposition to US policies with unprecedented frequency and severity, especially since Bush announced his determination to make war against Iraq.

The [AIPAC] lobby's intimidation remains pervasive. It seems to reach every government centre and even houses of worship and revered institutions of higher learning. It is highly effective in silencing the many US Jews who object to the lobby's tactics and Israel's brutality.

Nothing can justify 11 September. Those guilty deserve maximum punishment, but it makes sense for America to examine motivations promptly and as carefully as possible. Terrorism almost always arises from deeply-felt grievances. If they can be eradicated or eased, terrorist passions are certain to subside.

Today, a year after 11 September, President Bush has made no attempt to redress grievances, or even to identify them. In fact, he has made the scene far worse by supporting Israel's religious war against Palestinians, an alliance that has intensified anti-American anger. He seems oblivious to the fact that nearly two billion people worldwide regard the plight of Palestinians as today's most important foreign-policy challenge.

No one in authority will admit a calamitous reality that is skillfully shielded from the American people but clearly recognised by most of the world: America suffered 11 September and its aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because US policy in the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.

Israel is a scofflaw nation and should be treated as such. Instead of helping Sharon intensify Palestinian misery, our president should suspend all aid until Israel ends its occupation of Arab land Israel seized in 1967. The suspension would force Sharon's compliance or lead to his removal from office, as the Israeli electorate will not tolerate a prime minister who is at odds with the White House.

If Bush needs an additional reason for doing the right thing, he can justify the suspension as a matter of military necessity, an essential step in winning international support for his war on terrorism. He can cite a worthy precedent. When President Abraham Lincoln issued the proclamation that freed only the slaves in states that were then in rebellion, he made the restriction because of "military necessity".

If Bush suspends US aid, he will liberate all Americans from long years of bondage to Israel's misdeeds.

Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.